[Arbitration — Award — Recourse against award — Setting aside — Investor state arbitration — Arbitration agreement — Whether claims fell within the scope of submission to arbitration — Articles 34(2)(a)(i) and 34(2)(a)(iii) UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration]
[Arbitration — Award — Recourse against award — Setting aside — Breach of natural justice — Arbitral tribunal declining to admit additional evidence after hearing — Whether respondent in arbitration deprived of opportunity to present its case — Section 24(b) International Arbitration Act 1994 — Article 34(2)(a)(ii) UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration
]
[Arbitration — Award — Recourse against award — Setting aside — Jurisdiction — Host state’s government officials found to have acted in violation of free trade agreement — Host state objecting that acts were not “measures adopted or maintained” by host state “relating to” claimant in arbitration — Host state objecting that claimant in arbitration was not “investor” and lacked standing — Whether host state’s objections jurisdictional in nature — Articles 34(2)(a)(i) and 34(2)(a)(iii) UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration]
[Arbitration — Award — Recourse against award — Setting aside — Arbitral tribunal ruling on certain jurisdictional objections in initial decision and other jurisdictional objections in final award — Respondent in arbitration appealing against tribunal’s rulings on jurisdiction only in setting-aside application — Whether defendant in arbitration precluded from raising jurisdictional objection addressed in initial decision — Section 10(3) International Arbitration Act 1994 — Article 16(3) UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration]
[Companies — Oppression — Minority shareholders — Exercise of remedial discretion to bring to an end or remedy oppressive conduct complained of — Whether minority shareholder should be paid out of net proceeds of en bloc sale of total equity of company in priority to majority shareholder — Section 216(2) Companies Act 1967]
[Companies — Oppression — Minority shareholders — Exercise of remedial discretion to bring to an end or remedy oppressive conduct complained of — Whether minority shareholder should receive discretionary enhancement in economic value from en bloc sale of total equity of company to account for interest on purchase price — Whether economic value to be received by minority shareholder from en bloc sale of total equity of company should be set at quantum at least as high as economic value minority shareholder would have received from prior buy-out order based on valuation rendered by court but-for subsequent non-implementation of buy-out order by majority shareholder — Section 216(2) Companies Act 1967.
]