[Arbitration — Award — Recourse against award — Remission]
[Civil Procedure — Appeals — Adducing fresh evidence on appeal — Party seeking to adduce notes taken by solicitors of hearings below to challenge trial judge’s notes of evidence — Whether further evidence relevant to appeal]
[Civil Procedure — Appeals — Judge’s notes of hearing forming official record of hearing — Party alleging error in official record of hearing — Proper procedure for raising challenge to or seeking correction of official record of hearing]
[Legal Profession — Professional conduct — Breach — Rule 32 Legal Profession (Professional Conduct) Rules 2015]
[Legal Profession — Professional conduct — Breach — Rule 5(2) Legal Profession (Professional Conduct) Rules 2015]
[Legal Profession — Professional conduct — Breach — Rule 17(3) Legal Profession (Professional Conduct) Rules 2015]
[Legal Profession — Professional conduct — Breach — Rule 18(a) Legal Profession (Professional Conduct) Rules 2015]
[Legal Profession — Professional conduct — Breach — Rule 22(2) Legal Profession (Professional Conduct) Rules 2015]
[Legal Profession — Professional conduct — Breach — Rule 11(2)(a) Legal Profession (Professional Conduct) Rules 2015]
[Legal Profession — Professional conduct — Breach — Rule 16(3)(a) Legal Profession (Professional Conduct) Rules 2015]
[Legal Profession — Professional conduct — Improper conduct or practice as an advocate and solicitor — Breach of rules of conduct promulgated by Professional Conduct Council under Section 71(2) Legal Profession Act (Cap 161, 2009 Rev Ed) — Section 83(2)(b)(i) Legal Profession Act (Cap 161, 2009 Rev Ed)
]
[Legal Profession — Professional conduct — Due cause of sufficient gravity for advocate and solicitor to be liable to punishment — Sentencing principles — Circumstances in which order for advocate and solicitor to be struck off the roll is the presumptive penalty — Section 83(1)(a) Legal Profession Act (Cap 161, 2009 Rev Ed)]
[Civil Procedure — Mareva injunctions — Abuse of process]
[Civil Procedure — Mareva injunctions — Real risk of dissipation]
[Civil Procedure — Mareva injunctions — Full and frank disclosure]
[Civil Procedure — Proprietary injunction — Balance of convenience]
[Civil Procedure — Proprietary injunction — Serious question to be tried]
[Companies — Memorandum and articles of association — Whether director was validly removed — Interpretation of company’s memorandum and articles of association — Whether contra proferentem rule should apply]
[Companies — Directors — Director’s right to inspect company’s accounting and other records — Whether applicant has standing to bring application — Whether applicant is a director of company— Section 199 Companies Act 1967]
[Insolvency Law — Cross-border insolvency — Disclosure and examination orders — Whether disclosure and examination orders unreasonable, oppressive or unnecessary]
[Insolvency Law — Cross-border insolvency — Allegation of bad faith and material non-disclosure against foreign representatives — Whether recognition would be contrary to public policy — Art 6 UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency]
[Insolvency Law — Cross-border insolvency — Recognition of foreign insolvency proceedings — Presumption of COMI as place of registered office — Effect of presumption — Whether presumption rebutted on the balance of probabilities — Art 16(3) UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency]